Page 2 of 2

Re: ALPS replacement?

Posted: December 19th, 2017, 12:26 am
by Spaceowl
She Who Must Be Obeyed. The wife/significant other.

Good Odin, even the toner is £145 a time!

Re: ALPS replacement?

Posted: December 19th, 2017, 2:47 am
by JohnRatzenberger
Maverick231 wrote:Sorry to be a dumb ass but what does SWMBO mean?
As punishment, you must binge watch, or better read, Rumpole at the Bailey.

Re: ALPS replacement?

Posted: December 19th, 2017, 3:56 am
by Zee28
jRatz wrote:
Maverick231 wrote:Sorry to be a dumb ass but what does SWMBO mean?
As punishment, you must binge watch, or better read, Rumpole at the Bailey.
LOL John! :lol: Ahhh, The great Leo McKern, legend.

Maverick mate, you are NOT dumb mate, but you might want to be aware of the Glossary section here:

http://uamf.org.uk/viewforum.php?f=10;

Where any unfamiliar terms can be looked up.

Hope this helps.

Zee28

Re: ALPS replacement?

Posted: December 19th, 2017, 11:13 am
by general rocket
She who MUST be obeyed.
First used by H. Ryder Haggard in his book"She".
Popularised by John Mortimer in his"Rumpole of the Bailey" series.

Re: ALPS replacement?

Posted: December 19th, 2017, 1:14 pm
by JamesPerrin
... and frankly, that acronym is getting a bit past its sell-by date

Re: ALPS replacement?

Posted: December 19th, 2017, 3:41 pm
by Eric Mc
She Who Must be Obeyed - usually referring to a wife or partner.

From the H Ryder Haggard novel "She".

And made even more popular by fictional barrister Horace Rumpole in John Mortimer's stories and the related TV series. Rumpole's wife is a bit of a battleaxe, so he refers to her (not to her face) as "She, who must be obeyed".

Re: ALPS replacement?

Posted: December 19th, 2017, 4:44 pm
by Stuart
JamesPerrin wrote:... and frankly, that acronym is getting a bit past its sell-by date
True.

Re: ALPS replacement?

Posted: December 19th, 2017, 7:25 pm
by Zee28
I have never really liked it, which is why I have always changed it with an 'A'

Zee28

Re: ALPS replacement?

Posted: December 20th, 2017, 1:27 am
by IronMan129
Thanks for the education lesson haha!
So James, what would you like to use instead?

Re: ALPS replacement?

Posted: December 20th, 2017, 12:43 pm
by JamesPerrin
Maverick231 wrote:Thanks for the education lesson haha!
So James, what would you like to use instead?

erm.... "my wife"

Re: ALPS replacement?

Posted: December 22nd, 2017, 7:53 pm
by IronMan129
Its only a joke mate, Sally finds it hilarious.

Re: ALPS replacement?

Posted: December 25th, 2017, 5:00 pm
by Tarkas
Maverick231 wrote:Its only a joke mate, Sally finds it hilarious.
That's the important thing. If a potential SWMBO enjoys the joke, then it's a case of "no harm, no foul." If she doesn't, then don't use it -- as I don't, because I think my wife would be hurt by the implications. My VDW (very dear wife), as I refer to her on another forum, is very understanding that way -- though I think a 3-grand printer might be a bit much even for her. Like the idea of decal printing on demand, though.

Re: ALPS replacement?

Posted: December 26th, 2017, 10:36 am
by LVi
Those OKI White toner series printers aren't usable for decal printing. It print colours first and then white. It's perfect for T-shirts, transparencies or so but not for decals. Next reason is, that in this series black toner isn't present. Those printers use CMY + White. For this reason color fidelity of reproduction is not very good.
There are printers on the market with full CMYK + White, with white under colours in one pass. But price is far higher, around 15 000€. This is only regular replacement for ALPS. Better than ALPS, better printing results, resolution, faster print, better decal durability. I have it and I'm very satisfied.

LVi

Re: ALPS replacement?

Posted: December 26th, 2017, 11:27 am
by rob_van_riel
LVi wrote:Those OKI White toner series printers aren't usable for decal printing. It print colours first and then white.
That would seem to contradict what Oki say about the process, since they explicitly market these devices for printing on dark surfaces with an automatic white background for the colours. If what you say is true, they'll have at least 95% very angry customers; not a recipe for success..

Even if this is true, it would still enable two part decals, with the white separate from the other colours. I've even seen that sort of thing in professionally printed decals, and consider it a cheap cop-out in those cases, but for cottage industry, I'd gladly put up with it. The colour parts could even be printed on a different, CMYK laser.
Anyone and anything can get decent colour on a sheet of decal paper, the essential problem is getting the white on. Getting the white on conveniently (single pass with the other colours) would be a bonus, but not essential. To put it differently, should ALPS die, I'd be happy to replace it with a printer that can only do white.
Next reason is, that in this series black toner isn't present. Those printers use CMY + White. For this reason color fidelity of reproduction is not very good.
I must admit that had me worried as well. If the ALPS ever dies on me, a few test sheets would definitely be part of the purchase process.
There are printers on the market with full CMYK + White, with white under colours in one pass. But price is far higher, around 15 000€.
We're somewhat infected with insatiable curiosity around here. Even though these machines are way above our budgets, could you provide a link?