At The Moment

Show us a view of your workbench / work in progress and build reports too.
Post Reply
User avatar
Dazzled
Modelling Gent and Scholar
Posts: 9592
Joined: October 1st, 2011, 11:08 pm
Location: Mid Glamorgan, South Wales
Contact:

At The Moment

Post by Dazzled »

A shot or two of what's on my bench at the moment (and an opportunity to see if I can get photos to upload)

Two of my current builds, both to be finished in IJN grey so it seemed sensible to build them concurrently.

Image

On the left is a Hasegawa Nakajima A6M2-N and on the right is a Fujimi Mitsubishi A6M2. Basically a couple of Zeros with different undercarriages.

I had read, before starting, that the Hasegawa kit had exceptional parts fit and posed no construction problems. To the people who wrote this I'd say that they have a pretty odd idea of "good" in terms of fit.

Image

This is the gap at the rear of the wing and...

Image

Image

...these are the gaps at the wing roots AFTER the dihedral had been adjusted.

Filling these required the use of plstic strips and liberal quantities of Squadron white putty.


Image


On top of that, the cockpit also refused to play ball, proving that the fit problems aren't just down to the extra wing parts provided for the floatplane version and that the basic kit carries some flaws too. Firstly, the seat didn't want to sit squarely in the cockpit. After much fettling I got it to a reasonable angle so the imaginary pilot wouldn't end up with a sore neck. Then, just when I thought things were going well, the sides wouldn't go together because the instrument panel protruding from the left side fouled against the seat. Much cursing and clearing of glue followed. Chopping a bit off the panel was the only way to remedy this. Now I'll definately complete this model with a closed canopy!


The Fujimi kit, despite being an older, cheaper model, has been quite an easy build so far, although, looking at them side by side, I do wonder which kit is more dimensionally accurate. The only fit problem has been a slight step in one wing root joint that was easily rectified. Apart from that everything is hunky dory with little filler or sanding needed.

Image

One thing I have done to this model is to liberate the drop tank and main undercarriage (suitably nodified) from the Hasegawa kit, as these are much better detailed than the Fujimi offerings and are, naturally, redundant on the floatplane. These wait to be fitted when final painting is completed and/or when I throw the Hasegawa kit against a wall in frustration!
COLD WAR S.I.G. LEADER

Wherever there's danger, wherever there's trouble, wherever there's important work to be done....I'll be somewhere else building a model!
User avatar
Softscience
Staring out the window
Posts: 7457
Joined: April 5th, 2011, 4:34 pm
Location: Maryland, near Washington DC

Re: At The Moment

Post by Softscience »

I'm surprised at the poor fit on the Hasegawa Zero. My LHS is selling that kit for over $40. You would think with that kind of price...
User avatar
Ural
Active Participant
Posts: 542
Joined: May 4th, 2011, 8:10 pm
Location: Montevideo-Uruguay

Re: At The Moment

Post by Ural »

ouch!!!

Nasty surprise on Hasegawas kit!

regards

Henry
Post Reply

Return to “Workbench Window”