Fairey Swordfish References
Re: Fairey Swordfish References
Well I guess I have no choice now! Off to a craft store later in the week to get some Sculpy and try to make a master. Then I'll have to see who locally has a Mattel machine. Heck I was worried about finishing in time and the rigging, and now I have to make a canopy too...
It will be fun.
Jim
It will be fun.
Jim
Read my inane modeling writings at:
http://ascalecanadian.com
http://ascalecanadian.com
Re: Fairey Swordfish References
Brews,Brews wrote: I had intended to give you one,
I may still need to beg one from you...I have no idea, if I can pull it off or not. But it will be fun to try.
Thanks Paul for the pics and thanks John for the scans.
Jim
Read my inane modeling writings at:
http://ascalecanadian.com
http://ascalecanadian.com
- AndrewR
- In the basement lab
- Posts: 23913
- Joined: April 5th, 2011, 4:13 pm
- Location: Ottawa, Ontario, The Great White North
- Contact:
Re: Fairey Swordfish References
I have some photos of TH-M in the Canadian Aviation museum, if they'd be of any interest. I think that it's a rebuild job from several aircraft, so caution is advised...
This link is the museum handout
http://www.aviation.technomuses.ca/coll ... Swordfish/;
Cheers
Andrew
This link is the museum handout
http://www.aviation.technomuses.ca/coll ... Swordfish/;
Cheers
Andrew
Up in the Great White North
Re: Fairey Swordfish References
I need some assistance on Swordfish torpedoes. I have this picture from the the cover of a SMI showing a torpedo under the Swordfish.
I think it is MkXII but I have never seen a reference to that shroud around the fins and propellers.
Can any one help?
I think it is MkXII but I have never seen a reference to that shroud around the fins and propellers.
Can any one help?
Besting 60 years of mediocre building of average kits in the stand off scale
- philp
- Modelling Gent and Scholar
- Posts: 1279
- Joined: May 1st, 2011, 12:14 am
- Location: Kearns, Utah
- Contact:
Re: Fairey Swordfish References
Some nice profiles here:
http://www.cbrnp.com/profiles/quarter2/swordfish.htm;
Including a profile of Airjim's subject.
And here are a couple Taranto raiders.
http://www.cbrnp.com/profiles/quarter2/swordfish.htm;
Including a profile of Airjim's subject.
And here are a couple Taranto raiders.
- PaulBradley
- Staring out the window
- Posts: 21115
- Joined: April 6th, 2011, 3:08 pm
- Location: Flagstaff, AZ
Re: Fairey Swordfish References
Thanks for sharing those, Phil - some other options to think about...!
Paul
За демократію і незалежний Україну
"For Democracy and a Free Ukraine"
За демократію і незалежний Україну
"For Democracy and a Free Ukraine"
Re: Fairey Swordfish References
A bit late to the party, but in order to make folks feel better about this it is possible to find pictures of parked machines with the slats retracted. You might come across pictures of a machine with one slat retracted and the other deployed. I don't know how the slats operate, but if they're spring loaded it could simply be that the aircraft was parked into wind (as it should be of course!) when the photo was taken and the wind had sufficient velocity to close the slat. A cross wind might account for an asymmetric appearance. Alternatively if the pilot can choose to deploy the slats their state may depend on whether or not a particular pilot would habitually choose to deploy them for take offs and landings.Brews wrote:We're going to have to lower the leading edge slats unless we have an in-flight display, aren't we.
peebeep
- JohnRatzenberger
- Why is he so confused ?
- Posts: 15708
- Joined: April 5th, 2011, 3:42 pm
- Location: Living on a sandbar - Nags Head, NC.
Re: Fairey Swordfish References
The Swordfish used the Handley Page Anti-Stall Slat design, which is an automatic slat which self-deploys/retracts under certain areodynamic conditions. I think the notable first use of these slats was the HP.42, but certainly not limited to that.
Anyway, I do not know the design parameters which would cause extension/retraction on the Swordfish, but inconsistent positioning on the ground would seem logical considering landing configuration, wind across a parked aircraft (as peebeep discusses), worn springs, etc ...
Anyway, I do not know the design parameters which would cause extension/retraction on the Swordfish, but inconsistent positioning on the ground would seem logical considering landing configuration, wind across a parked aircraft (as peebeep discusses), worn springs, etc ...
John Ratzenberger
It's my model and I'll do what I want with it.
It's my model and I'll do what I want with it.
- PaulBradley
- Staring out the window
- Posts: 21115
- Joined: April 6th, 2011, 3:08 pm
- Location: Flagstaff, AZ
Re: Fairey Swordfish References
...same as the '109 then.
Paul
За демократію і незалежний Україну
"For Democracy and a Free Ukraine"
За демократію і незалежний Україну
"For Democracy and a Free Ukraine"
Re: Fairey Swordfish References
There may have been enough friction in the system to allow them to stay retracted. Ground crews or flight crews preparing for flight may have flexed them to test operation and they would then stay down. At least that's my story so I don't cut mine out. I'm afraid the cockpit area is all I can handle at the moment.
Besting 60 years of mediocre building of average kits in the stand off scale
Re: Fairey Swordfish References
I've since found out that the slats are automatic, but can be locked. Also any tendency to asymmetry when the aircraft is parked should be considered normal. So there's no need to feel you're slacking if you leave them retracted.
peebeep
peebeep
Re: Fairey Swordfish References
Can anyone assist me in the shape of the windows behind the lower wing/fuselage struts to aid the pilots downward vision? They seem to be upside down triangles.
Besting 60 years of mediocre building of average kits in the stand off scale
Re: Fairey Swordfish References
Any ideas as to what the crew should be wearing? I've seen photos of them wearing RAF uniform, with a Mae West and leather helmet, but that doesn't seem overly sensible, over the cold briny.
I'm guessing thick, brown coats.
Regards,
Bruce
I'm guessing thick, brown coats.
Regards,
Bruce
Re: Fairey Swordfish References
Is there a recessed area for the tailhook on the 'fish? It would appear so, but Matchbox/Revell want me just to glue it to the bottom of the fuselage...and that doesn't seem right to me.
Jim
Jim
Read my inane modeling writings at:
http://ascalecanadian.com
http://ascalecanadian.com
Re: Fairey Swordfish References
Good point. I have a Frogspawn boxing so I'll dig that out as a pattern.Brews wrote:Yes, there is. If you get a FROG Swordfish, and make the floatplane version, you get the recessed area as a spare. So ... someone may have a spare if you ask nicely.
Thanks much.
Jim
Read my inane modeling writings at:
http://ascalecanadian.com
http://ascalecanadian.com