Softscience's Spitfire IX, eh?

Rhubarb! The RAF Fighter Command takes the offensive 1941-1944.
Runs 1-30 June.
User avatar
Martin R
Modelling Gent and Scholar
Posts: 4695
Joined: May 1st, 2011, 7:53 am

Re: Softscience's Spitfire IX, eh?

Post by Martin R »

Softscience wrote:....and with decals. And I sprayed on a flat coat, with just a dash of Radome tan mixed into it. Its amazing how much difference that makes


Image
Wow, Ralph, that looks great!

I don't know how it looks in real life, but in the photo with the weathering and the flat coat, The panel lines appear to be visually de-emphasised. Everyone gets excited about the "massive" panel lines on this kit, but if you don't put in a heavy black wash, they just add some visual interest to the surface - in my opinion anyway. Accuracy - nil points; trompe l'oeil - hell, yeah!

regards,

Martin
User avatar
AndrewR
In the basement lab
Posts: 24100
Joined: April 5th, 2011, 4:13 pm
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, The Great White North
Contact:

Re: Softscience's Spitfire IX, eh?

Post by AndrewR »

Martin R wrote:
Wow, Ralph, that looks great!

I don't know how it looks in real life, but in the photo with the weathering and the flat coat, The panel lines appear to be visually de-emphasised. Everyone gets excited about the "massive" panel lines on this kit, but if you don't put in a heavy black wash, they just add some visual interest to the surface - in my opinion anyway. Accuracy - nil points; trompe l'oeil - hell, yeah!

regards,

Martin
I had to look up "Trumpy Oil" :oops: :ha:

And you are right Martin, it looks great and the panel lines give some visual interests. Actually, if you think about it, either raised or engraved panel lines are usually a trompe l'oell.

Cheers

Andrew
Up in the Great White North
User avatar
Martin R
Modelling Gent and Scholar
Posts: 4695
Joined: May 1st, 2011, 7:53 am

Re: Softscience's Spitfire IX, eh?

Post by Martin R »

AndrewR wrote: Actually, if you think about it, either raised or engraved panel lines are usually a trompe l'oell.

Cheers

Andrew
Andrew,

Quite! See how 'toy like' your model looks like with no surface detail at all. It may be more accurate - but somehow it doesn't 'look' right. I think some of Allan Buttrick's stuff, where he sands off raised panel lines and then uses pencil lines to 'reinstate' them, is absolutely fantastic.

regards,
Martin R

"the 'R' stands for 'Representative'."
User avatar
Softscience
Staring out the window
Posts: 7488
Joined: April 5th, 2011, 4:34 pm
Location: Maryland, near Washington DC

Re: Softscience's Spitfire IX, eh?

Post by Softscience »

the same technique applies to weathering. Somewhere on teh interwebz is an article I wrote about a Revell Hurricane IIc I built up several years ago. On that model I tried to utilize weathering techniques I typically use on larger scale kits (and where they work especially well), and the result was just a mess. The weathering was "realistic", but it just looked awful on this tiny little model, as it didn't fool the eye into believing it was a smaller version of the real thing.

Doubly true on panel lines. No approach is especially realistic, but petite lines, whether they're raised or lowered, do make the subject more realistic and pleasing to the brain
User avatar
Martin R
Modelling Gent and Scholar
Posts: 4695
Joined: May 1st, 2011, 7:53 am

Re: Softscience's Spitfire IX, eh?

Post by Martin R »

Ralph,

Really looking forward to seeing this one finished!

regards,

Martin
Tommy
The Bug Has Well And Truly Bitten
Posts: 220
Joined: May 1st, 2011, 3:54 pm

Re: Softscience's Spitfire IX, eh?

Post by Tommy »

Nice Ralph! I like the radome tan tip.

Tommy
User avatar
Softscience
Staring out the window
Posts: 7488
Joined: April 5th, 2011, 4:34 pm
Location: Maryland, near Washington DC

Re: Softscience's Spitfire IX, eh?

Post by Softscience »

Thank you Martin and Tommy.

And thank you Bruce (Brews) for the info on the prop tips and mirror.


Tonight I finished it. Woohoo! I finally successfully completed a group build!!

I'm pleasantly surprised at how well the kit turned out. The photos are not the best, but I think they capture the overall look ok. The base is temporary until I figure out something more attractive and wooden.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Now I really need to go build something thats not a spitfire :)
Tommy
The Bug Has Well And Truly Bitten
Posts: 220
Joined: May 1st, 2011, 3:54 pm

Re: Softscience's Spitfire IX, eh?

Post by Tommy »

You made it! :party

Beautiful Ralph!

Is that Buzz Beurling's Spitfire, by any chance?

Tommy
User avatar
flakmonkey
Modelling Gent and Scholar
Posts: 3489
Joined: April 6th, 2011, 9:58 am
Location: Down in the tube station at midnight
Contact:

Re: Softscience's Spitfire IX, eh?

Post by flakmonkey »

Nice job Ralph. The weathering on the undersides is well done; people often weather Spitfire undersides by copying the 1:1 exactly with no thought for scale, as you mentioned earlier, which looks ugly. You've pulled off the trick of capturing the look and feel and letting the viewer fill in the rest which is a much more attractive and sympathetic treatment.
Would ya like to learn to fly? Would ya? Would you like to see me try?
User avatar
AndrewR
In the basement lab
Posts: 24100
Joined: April 5th, 2011, 4:13 pm
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, The Great White North
Contact:

Re: Softscience's Spitfire IX, eh?

Post by AndrewR »

Nice one Ralph!

:partytime:

Cheers

Andrew
Up in the Great White North
User avatar
Dirkpitt289
NUMA's Auto Mechanic
Posts: 8724
Joined: May 2nd, 2011, 1:55 am
Location: New jersey USA
Contact:

Re: Softscience's Spitfire IX, eh?

Post by Dirkpitt289 »

Well done Ralph. Smartly done
.... Dirk

Beware of the DOG's of WAR

My Youtube Channel
https://www.youtube.com/user/ModelingGu ... rid&view=0
User avatar
MackemPete
Onto the Clever Stuff, Now.
Posts: 123
Joined: May 1st, 2011, 1:35 pm
Location: Sunderland

Re: Softscience's Spitfire IX, eh?

Post by MackemPete »

Class work mate. Hope to get mine finished soon!
Pete
User avatar
airjim
Sprue Teaser
Posts: 674
Joined: May 1st, 2011, 5:14 am
Location: Amorica
Contact:

Re: Softscience's Spitfire IX, eh?

Post by airjim »

Great looking Spitfire Ralph.

Jim
Read my inane modeling writings at:
http://ascalecanadian.com
User avatar
Softscience
Staring out the window
Posts: 7488
Joined: April 5th, 2011, 4:34 pm
Location: Maryland, near Washington DC

Re: Softscience's Spitfire IX, eh?

Post by Softscience »

Thanks guys.

I really need to replace the base with something more substantial though. Today a truck drove by the house and the vibrations knocked the spitfire over. It didn't get damaged, but if I keep it as is, than I'm only asking for it.

A nice little block of wood, which I could then stain, should do the trick
User avatar
jssel
Still crazy after all these years
Posts: 12005
Joined: April 5th, 2011, 3:42 pm

Re: Softscience's Spitfire IX, eh?

Post by jssel »

Congrats on the finish Ralph. Looks very nice indeed.
Besting 60 years of mediocre building of average kits in the stand off scale
Locked

Return to “The 'Rhubarb' GB”