Martin Baker MB5; Airframe 1/72 vacform
Martin Baker MB5; Airframe 1/72 vacform
I once bought a Martin Baker MB2 by accident. I misread the 2 for a 5. That’s what can happen when one buys on impulse from cardboard boxes in the dark recesses under dealers’ tables at model shows. ‘Should ‘ve gone to Specsavers’ (other opticians are available).
The MB2 was a vacform and a pretty awful one at that. It was so bad that the shape could have been almost anything. Needless to say, I built it anyway. But since then, I have been on the lookout for an MB5. I found one in my usual haunt, i.e. in a cardboard box on the floor at the 2017 Telford show, so I splashed out the £1.50 that the dealer was asking for it. There are times when ‘is that the death on price?’ seems inappropriate and this was one of them.
The Martin Baker MB5 seems to be one of those iconic ‘failures’ of the British aviation industry. Only one was built (the replica in the USA does not count). It performed well, but it just seems to have missed the proverbial boat in terms of being at the right place at the right time. Eric Brown said it was ‘outstanding’. That’s enough proof of its quality for me. Has anyone attempted to build a model of every aircraft in which ‘Winkle’ Brown flew? The problem seems to have been that the jet age had arrived – its contra-rotating props and a piston engine were yesterday’s technology for a fighter, though the Wyvern did have some success.
The Airframe vacform kit is, like the MB2, quite dreadful, but only if you are looking for everything to be done for you. The basic shapes for wings and fuselage are provided, but that’s all. There is no surface detail on any of the shapes. Another problem is that the plastic is rather thin, made worse by the fact that since it is long out of production, the plastic has to be cut with extra care to avoid splits.
I scribed some panel lines on the wings and fuselage using the kit’s basic plans as a guide. The cockpit was scratch built as nothing was provided. The undercarriage was also scratch built with wheels coming from the spares box. The canopy was old and yellowed so I had to mould a new one in clear plastic card.
I used enamel paint for the green and acrylics for the grey and yellow. The green is probably too light a shade. It seems to look fine in the photos but under bright light, some very suspect lumpy areas are all too evident. I really should remove the paint, sand it down and start all over again. I just can’t face it.
Decals came from spare bits, cobbled together as best I could. Any inaccurate markings are due to compromises I had to make. The prototype ‘P’, for example, is not exactly as on the aircraft.
My curiosity about the MB5 is now satisfied and life can move on.
The MB2 was a vacform and a pretty awful one at that. It was so bad that the shape could have been almost anything. Needless to say, I built it anyway. But since then, I have been on the lookout for an MB5. I found one in my usual haunt, i.e. in a cardboard box on the floor at the 2017 Telford show, so I splashed out the £1.50 that the dealer was asking for it. There are times when ‘is that the death on price?’ seems inappropriate and this was one of them.
The Martin Baker MB5 seems to be one of those iconic ‘failures’ of the British aviation industry. Only one was built (the replica in the USA does not count). It performed well, but it just seems to have missed the proverbial boat in terms of being at the right place at the right time. Eric Brown said it was ‘outstanding’. That’s enough proof of its quality for me. Has anyone attempted to build a model of every aircraft in which ‘Winkle’ Brown flew? The problem seems to have been that the jet age had arrived – its contra-rotating props and a piston engine were yesterday’s technology for a fighter, though the Wyvern did have some success.
The Airframe vacform kit is, like the MB2, quite dreadful, but only if you are looking for everything to be done for you. The basic shapes for wings and fuselage are provided, but that’s all. There is no surface detail on any of the shapes. Another problem is that the plastic is rather thin, made worse by the fact that since it is long out of production, the plastic has to be cut with extra care to avoid splits.
I scribed some panel lines on the wings and fuselage using the kit’s basic plans as a guide. The cockpit was scratch built as nothing was provided. The undercarriage was also scratch built with wheels coming from the spares box. The canopy was old and yellowed so I had to mould a new one in clear plastic card.
I used enamel paint for the green and acrylics for the grey and yellow. The green is probably too light a shade. It seems to look fine in the photos but under bright light, some very suspect lumpy areas are all too evident. I really should remove the paint, sand it down and start all over again. I just can’t face it.
Decals came from spare bits, cobbled together as best I could. Any inaccurate markings are due to compromises I had to make. The prototype ‘P’, for example, is not exactly as on the aircraft.
My curiosity about the MB5 is now satisfied and life can move on.
- The Great Auk
- Modelling Gent and Scholar
- Posts: 2041
- Joined: August 16th, 2014, 12:35 pm
- Location: Extinction Isle
Re: Martin Baker MB5; Airframe 1/72 vacform
That's an excellent result from what sounds like an incredibly challenging kit!
MB-5s are certainly unusual and one doesn't see them built up often. I most enjoyed yours even if it's not totally accurate.
The Great Auk
MB-5s are certainly unusual and one doesn't see them built up often. I most enjoyed yours even if it's not totally accurate.
The Great Auk
- DavidWomby
- Modelling Gent and Scholar
- Posts: 11759
- Joined: May 1st, 2011, 8:09 pm
- Location: Florida, USA
Re: Martin Baker MB5; Airframe 1/72 vacform
Well done, Vacant. There are easier kits of the MB5 available but that has turned out really well.
David
PS - yes, I've built the AirFrame MB2 and do understand.
David
PS - yes, I've built the AirFrame MB2 and do understand.
- iggie
- Modelling Gent and Scholar
- Posts: 23436
- Joined: July 31st, 2013, 11:04 am
- Location: North Somercotes, Lincolnshire
- Contact:
Re: Martin Baker MB5; Airframe 1/72 vacform
That's an excellent build of what sounds like a crappy kit!
Best wishes
Jim
If you can walk away from a landing, it's a good landing. If you use the airplane the next day, it's an outstanding landing
"Never put off till tomorrow, what you can do the day after tomorrow"
Jim
If you can walk away from a landing, it's a good landing. If you use the airplane the next day, it's an outstanding landing
"Never put off till tomorrow, what you can do the day after tomorrow"
Re: Martin Baker MB5; Airframe 1/72 vacform
Well tidy again vacant,you truly are a master at vacforms.
-
- Modelling Gent and Scholar
- Posts: 5338
- Joined: April 1st, 2013, 6:45 pm
Re: Martin Baker MB5; Airframe 1/72 vacform
I echo what the others have written. Once again you have turned out a silk purse from a sow's ear.
- gnomemeansgnome
- Modelling Gent and Scholar
- Posts: 5269
- Joined: July 16th, 2013, 4:03 pm
- Location: No Fun City
Re: Martin Baker MB5; Airframe 1/72 vacform
Very nice as always, Vacant. Pretty nifty looking aircraft. I am a sucker for contraprop driven birds.
Ego no habeo consilium.
ICBM = Insatiable Collector and Builder of Models
ICBM = Insatiable Collector and Builder of Models
Re: Martin Baker MB5; Airframe 1/72 vacform
Very nice. I think my M.B.5 is the Pegasus models one. Quite good actually.
Hoping to return to modelling sometime this year!!
Owner of Marky's Model Emporium since 2013!.
Owner of Marky's Model Emporium since 2013!.
-
- NOT the sheep
- Posts: 26188
- Joined: November 26th, 2011, 6:11 pm
- Location: Pontefract West Yorkshire
Re: Martin Baker MB5; Airframe 1/72 vacform
Another great vacform build, Vacant and yet another silk purse from a sow's ear. To my eyes though, the MB5 isn't an object of beauty although I suppose it does have a certain brutal charm! The Wyvern did have a degree of success but was that not a turboprop design and perhaps possessing better performance?
Doing - Tamiya 1/35th Universal Carrier.
Work is the curse of the modelling classes!
IPMS#12300
Work is the curse of the modelling classes!
IPMS#12300
Re: Martin Baker MB5; Airframe 1/72 vacform
Yes, the Wyvern engine was a turboprop - my sloppy wording.
- Tarkas
- Active Participant
- Posts: 623
- Joined: August 9th, 2012, 6:24 pm
- Location: Geosynchronous orbit, but at a very low altitude
Re: Martin Baker MB5; Airframe 1/72 vacform
Wot, all 487 -- and that's just the different types, not counting variants, marks, etc. That'd be one heck of a collection. Unless you mean every individual aircraft he flew in, in which case I'm going somewhere else; that would run to thousands of aircraft, and I doubt your grandkids would be able to finish them all.vacant wrote:Has anyone attempted to build a model of every aircraft in which ‘Winkle’ Brown flew?
I still say someone should have found another 13 types for Winkle to make up a full 500. Don't think anyone else will ever be able to beat his figure.
Pretty much; it was also that what was already available before the jets was more than adequate, and the expense and time needed to put the MB5 into production couldn't really be justified. Not unlike the CA-15 Kangaroo -- brilliant aircraft, but too late, so that it was both out-dated and not needed by the time it would have gone into service.The problem seems to have been that the jet age had arrived – its contra-rotating props and a piston engine were yesterday’s technology for a fighter, though the Wyvern did have some success.
Nice model, though.
Ping! Ping!! Ping!!! -- Mother Box
She's such a chatterbox, sometimes...
She's such a chatterbox, sometimes...
- Stamford
- Modelling Gent and Scholar
- Posts: 2240
- Joined: May 1st, 2011, 7:42 am
- Location: Klågerup Sweden
Re: Martin Baker MB5; Airframe 1/72 vacform
Is it just me or does it look like a Mustang thats been on the pies!
running at the edge of their world
- FAAMAN
- The Bug Has Well And Truly Bitten
- Posts: 404
- Joined: October 14th, 2014, 3:49 am
- Location: Sydney Australia
Re: Martin Baker MB5; Airframe 1/72 vacform
So nicely done, you are a magician versed in the dark art of vac forms Vacant
Been modelling for years, still learning . . . .
Model kits are meant to be assembled . . . . . . . . . . eventually.
Model kits are meant to be assembled . . . . . . . . . . eventually.
- skypirate
- Modelling Gent and Scholar
- Posts: 7299
- Joined: May 1st, 2011, 6:13 am
- Location: Port Macquarie, Australia
Re: Martin Baker MB5; Airframe 1/72 vacform
Very well done, as usual!
I have just seen the recent AZ model kit and it made me realise what a big aeroplane this is, relatively.
It would be nice to see a picture of it alongside a P-51 in the same scale.
Cheers,
David
I have just seen the recent AZ model kit and it made me realise what a big aeroplane this is, relatively.
It would be nice to see a picture of it alongside a P-51 in the same scale.
Cheers,
David