David's late Mbox Mossie B35 - can't finish in time.
Re: David's late Mbox Mossie B35
David,
To be honest, you'd get recesses with PVA as well, as the windows are (supposed to be) curved.
regards,
Martin
To be honest, you'd get recesses with PVA as well, as the windows are (supposed to be) curved.
regards,
Martin
- iggie
- Modelling Gent and Scholar
- Posts: 23438
- Joined: July 31st, 2013, 11:04 am
- Location: North Somercotes, Lincolnshire
- Contact:
Re: David's late Mbox Mossie B35
Blow gently on the pva/clearfix until it starts to stiffen; curved profile windows....
Best wishes
Jim
If you can walk away from a landing, it's a good landing. If you use the airplane the next day, it's an outstanding landing
"Never put off till tomorrow, what you can do the day after tomorrow"
Jim
If you can walk away from a landing, it's a good landing. If you use the airplane the next day, it's an outstanding landing
"Never put off till tomorrow, what you can do the day after tomorrow"
- TomW
- Modelling Gent and Scholar
- Posts: 2279
- Joined: May 1st, 2011, 8:09 am
- Location: Devizes, Wiltshire
Re: David's late Mbox Mossie B35
Plus leave them to dry inverted so gravity helps to draw them down towards the frame edges (but you knew that already )iggie wrote:Blow gently on the pva/clearfix until it starts to stiffen; curved profile windows....
Regards
Tom
Veni, Venari, Vamoosi
Coastal Command SIG Leader 2012 - 2016
We'll call him Dinghy Watts...... - Paul Bradley
2016 A:B = 29:11
2015 A:B = 38:14
2014 A:B = 25:9
2013 A:B = 20:17
2012 A:B = I didn't keep score
2011 A:B = 39:11
2010 A:B = 51:10
Coastal Command SIG Leader 2012 - 2016
We'll call him Dinghy Watts...... - Paul Bradley
2016 A:B = 29:11
2015 A:B = 38:14
2014 A:B = 25:9
2013 A:B = 20:17
2012 A:B = I didn't keep score
2011 A:B = 39:11
2010 A:B = 51:10
- DavidWomby
- Modelling Gent and Scholar
- Posts: 11765
- Joined: May 1st, 2011, 8:09 pm
- Location: Florida, USA
Re: David's late Mbox Mossie B35
Thanks, gents. I'll keep experimenting for a bit longer with these suggestions.
David
David
Re: David's late Mbox Mossie B35
'Blown' perspex. Of course!iggie wrote:Blow gently on the pva/clearfix until it starts to stiffen; curved profile windows....
regards,
Martin
- DavidWomby
- Modelling Gent and Scholar
- Posts: 11765
- Joined: May 1st, 2011, 8:09 pm
- Location: Florida, USA
Re: David's late Mbox Mossie B35
I decided in the end to use the kit windows on each side of the nose. I thinned them a bit, dipped them in Future and then attached them with CA. If they get damaged or dislodged during the rest of the build, I will punch them in before putting on the nose transparency, shake them out and fill the windows with PVA or Clearfix.
The fuselage is now closed up (it had to be re-opened briefly when I realised I had forgotten to put the tailwheel in!). I believe the instrument decal is for a P-51 but it will do for me.
I have also attached the Aeroclub vacform bomb bay which fit really well although I probably will need a little filler to smooth it in
A trip to HobbyLobby today also found some fine brass rod/wire that I think will do nicely for the wing antennas.
David
The fuselage is now closed up (it had to be re-opened briefly when I realised I had forgotten to put the tailwheel in!). I believe the instrument decal is for a P-51 but it will do for me.
I have also attached the Aeroclub vacform bomb bay which fit really well although I probably will need a little filler to smooth it in
A trip to HobbyLobby today also found some fine brass rod/wire that I think will do nicely for the wing antennas.
David
-
- Modelling Gent and Scholar
- Posts: 4422
- Joined: May 1st, 2011, 11:14 am
- Location: Doncaster, Socialist Republic of South Yorkshire.
Re: David's late Mbox Mossie B35
Coming along nicely Davis, the Mossie is a MBox that has so far eluded my grasp. They are getting more and more expensive.
- TomW
- Modelling Gent and Scholar
- Posts: 2279
- Joined: May 1st, 2011, 8:09 am
- Location: Devizes, Wiltshire
Re: David's late Mbox Mossie B35
It's one I'd like to do someday too, especially if I can hold of the same conversion parts. This is looking brilliant David
Regards
Tom
Regards
Tom
Veni, Venari, Vamoosi
Coastal Command SIG Leader 2012 - 2016
We'll call him Dinghy Watts...... - Paul Bradley
2016 A:B = 29:11
2015 A:B = 38:14
2014 A:B = 25:9
2013 A:B = 20:17
2012 A:B = I didn't keep score
2011 A:B = 39:11
2010 A:B = 51:10
Coastal Command SIG Leader 2012 - 2016
We'll call him Dinghy Watts...... - Paul Bradley
2016 A:B = 29:11
2015 A:B = 38:14
2014 A:B = 25:9
2013 A:B = 20:17
2012 A:B = I didn't keep score
2011 A:B = 39:11
2010 A:B = 51:10
- fredk
- Modelling Gent and Scholar
- Posts: 6195
- Joined: May 1st, 2012, 6:25 am
- Location: Donaghadee, N'rn Ir'n
Re: David's late Mbox Mossie B35
Coming along well now
Al speling misteaks aer all mi own werk..
Its not just how good your painting is, its how good the touch-ups are too.
Its not just how good your painting is, its how good the touch-ups are too.
- DavidWomby
- Modelling Gent and Scholar
- Posts: 11765
- Joined: May 1st, 2011, 8:09 pm
- Location: Florida, USA
Re: David's late Mbox Mossie B35
I have found a few photos of VP202 (the one I am building) including this one http://www.14sqn-association.org.uk/Blu ... to.html#11.
I think the wingtip antennae are three poles in line ahead but some photos of other B35s have a different arrangement. Do we agree these are line ahead. That's also the way Colin's decal instructions show it.
Also, the underwing pylon/bomb rack looks different from the Mbox one. In this pic, it looks very short with a vertical rear edge whereas the Mbox one is longer extending towards the rear of the wing. Am I seeing that right?
Thanks for any insights.
David
I think the wingtip antennae are three poles in line ahead but some photos of other B35s have a different arrangement. Do we agree these are line ahead. That's also the way Colin's decal instructions show it.
Also, the underwing pylon/bomb rack looks different from the Mbox one. In this pic, it looks very short with a vertical rear edge whereas the Mbox one is longer extending towards the rear of the wing. Am I seeing that right?
Thanks for any insights.
David
- iggie
- Modelling Gent and Scholar
- Posts: 23438
- Joined: July 31st, 2013, 11:04 am
- Location: North Somercotes, Lincolnshire
- Contact:
Re: David's late Mbox Mossie B35 - Jan 12: need opinions
In my view, especially looking at the photo previous to the one you linked to, the poles seem to be in a line outward, not fore and aft
Best wishes
Jim
If you can walk away from a landing, it's a good landing. If you use the airplane the next day, it's an outstanding landing
"Never put off till tomorrow, what you can do the day after tomorrow"
Jim
If you can walk away from a landing, it's a good landing. If you use the airplane the next day, it's an outstanding landing
"Never put off till tomorrow, what you can do the day after tomorrow"
Re: David's late Mbox Mossie B35 - Jan 12: need opinions
+1iggie wrote:In my view, especially looking at the photo previous to the one you linked to, the poles seem to be in a line outward, not fore and aft
I also don't know what that thing is under the wing on the parked photograph, but it isn't a bomb rack. I can see no evidence of a bomb rack under the wing in any photograph. However, there are drop tanks underwing in some. Could it be a fixing for that? Whatever, why not use the kit bits for the drop tanks instead?
regards,
Martin
- fredk
- Modelling Gent and Scholar
- Posts: 6195
- Joined: May 1st, 2012, 6:25 am
- Location: Donaghadee, N'rn Ir'n
Re: David's late Mbox Mossie B35 - Jan 12: need opinions
I think I support the others' opinions and go with the three poles angling outwards in alignment.
I'd also support your use of the slipper tanks, rather than bomb racks under the wings.
I'd also support your use of the slipper tanks, rather than bomb racks under the wings.
Al speling misteaks aer all mi own werk..
Its not just how good your painting is, its how good the touch-ups are too.
Its not just how good your painting is, its how good the touch-ups are too.
- DavidWomby
- Modelling Gent and Scholar
- Posts: 11765
- Joined: May 1st, 2011, 8:09 pm
- Location: Florida, USA
Re: David's late Mbox Mossie B35 - Jan 12: need opinions
Thanks all. I'm not keen on putting the slipper tanks on. I have a set of 100 gallon ones on my 'in progress' NF36 and another set of those spare plus the 50 gallon tanks that came in the kit but I'd rather leave the wing clean or have the bomb pylons on.
I think the antenna pattern may be as below.
I get this based on this pic on Air Britain's website http://www.abpic.co.uk/images/images/1231588F.jpg and this one of two 139 squadron B35s.
I stuck 3 pins in a piece of cardboard and compared it to the pics of VP202 and the pins in this config do align with those pics when held at the angle the pics show of the wing.
David
I think the antenna pattern may be as below.
I get this based on this pic on Air Britain's website http://www.abpic.co.uk/images/images/1231588F.jpg and this one of two 139 squadron B35s.
I stuck 3 pins in a piece of cardboard and compared it to the pics of VP202 and the pins in this config do align with those pics when held at the angle the pics show of the wing.
David
- fredk
- Modelling Gent and Scholar
- Posts: 6195
- Joined: May 1st, 2012, 6:25 am
- Location: Donaghadee, N'rn Ir'n
Re: David's late Mbox Mossie B35 - Jan 12: need opinions
Well, done. Very good bit of research.
Go with what ever you want under the wings. It is your model after all
Nothing built by 'committee' ever works out,
Go with what ever you want under the wings. It is your model after all
Nothing built by 'committee' ever works out,
Al speling misteaks aer all mi own werk..
Its not just how good your painting is, its how good the touch-ups are too.
Its not just how good your painting is, its how good the touch-ups are too.