Rob's Tonka *finished*
- Old_Tonto
- Modelling Gent and Scholar
- Posts: 8063
- Joined: May 1st, 2011, 7:41 pm
- Location: Middlesbrough, Peoples Republic of Teesside.
Re: Rob's Tonka
Proper bonkers Rob. I love it.
2023 - A:0 B:0 C:0
Current Projects:
East German Air Force (1956-90)
South African Air Force (1958-93)
Current Projects:
East German Air Force (1956-90)
South African Air Force (1958-93)
- splash
- Senior Service Rotorhead
- Posts: 13828
- Joined: May 1st, 2011, 11:02 am
- Location: Somerset England
Re: Rob's Tonka
It's looking great, what colours are you going for, traditional green,brown, black or all over grey?
My work bench is starting to look like Portsmouth Naval Dockyard.
-
- NOT the sheep
- Posts: 26188
- Joined: November 26th, 2011, 6:11 pm
- Location: Pontefract West Yorkshire
Re: Rob's Tonka
Madness! but in a good way!!
Doing - Tamiya 1/35th Universal Carrier.
Work is the curse of the modelling classes!
IPMS#12300
Work is the curse of the modelling classes!
IPMS#12300
-
- Modelling Gent and Scholar
- Posts: 3325
- Joined: November 4th, 2012, 11:28 am
- Location: The Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: Rob's Tonka
Green, brown, black camo. Actually, one of the things that got the whole idea started was Mavericks Tornado in those colours, with the 617 commemorative markings on the tail, built around the time of the Dambusters GB (I'd link to a picture, but it's no longer available, and Maverick has better things to do than dig out old pictures right now). Those colours just look right on a Tornado, so part of me was looking for an excuse since thensplash wrote:It's looking great, what colours are you going for, traditional green,brown, black or all over grey?
- splash
- Senior Service Rotorhead
- Posts: 13828
- Joined: May 1st, 2011, 11:02 am
- Location: Somerset England
Re: Rob's Tonka
Nice choice it should look brilliant in those colours.
My work bench is starting to look like Portsmouth Naval Dockyard.
-
- NOT the sheep
- Posts: 26188
- Joined: November 26th, 2011, 6:11 pm
- Location: Pontefract West Yorkshire
Re: Rob's Tonka
As a Dambusters whif I think the classic WW II Bomber Command scheme is the best choice.
Doing - Tamiya 1/35th Universal Carrier.
Work is the curse of the modelling classes!
IPMS#12300
Work is the curse of the modelling classes!
IPMS#12300
Re: Rob's Tonka
Looks mad but I like it!!!. Pity you can't semi-recess the weapon. You wouldn't want even a small bump on the runway or it would smack the weapon every two feet!!. But I love the idea so keep going!.
Hoping to return to modelling sometime this year!!
Owner of Marky's Model Emporium since 2013!.
Owner of Marky's Model Emporium since 2013!.
-
- Modelling Gent and Scholar
- Posts: 3325
- Joined: November 4th, 2012, 11:28 am
- Location: The Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: Rob's Tonka
Yup, takeoff would be hairy business with this load. Next time we should ask Mr Wallis to design something that will fit under the wings. Or something with wings you could fit a bouncer under. Or something..MarkyM607 wrote:Looks mad but I like it!!!. Pity you can't semi-recess the weapon. You wouldn't want even a small bump on the runway or it would smack the weapon every two feet!!. But I love the idea so keep going!.
-
- Modelling Gent and Scholar
- Posts: 3325
- Joined: November 4th, 2012, 11:28 am
- Location: The Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: Rob's Tonka
Yup, takeoff would be hairy business with this load. Next time we should ask Mr Wallis to design something that will fit under the wings. Or something with wings you could fit a bouncer under. Or something..MarkyM607 wrote:Looks mad but I like it!!!. Pity you can't semi-recess the weapon. You wouldn't want even a small bump on the runway or it would smack the weapon every two feet!!. But I love the idea so keep going!.
How's you Vulcan coming along?
Re: Rob's Tonka
This gives me a thought. What other aircraft could carry an upkeep? My first thought would be a Canberra. Sweet work so far mate.
All the best.
Greg.
All the best.
Greg.
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe.
The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits.
Albert Einstein
The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits.
Albert Einstein
-
- Modelling Gent and Scholar
- Posts: 3325
- Joined: November 4th, 2012, 11:28 am
- Location: The Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: Rob's Tonka
If I recall correctly, the Upkeep system weighed in at a bit over 10000 lbs. That exceeds the payload specs for a Canberra or Buccaneer (or even TSR2, since we're whiffing anyways). While Phantom could handle the weight, it couldn't take it all on the centreline hardpoint, nor would it have room under the fuselage for something this bulky; Typhoon would have the same issues.Gregers wrote:What other aircraft could carry an upkeep? My first thought would be a Canberra. Sweet work so far mate.
The V-force could handle such a load, as could Nimrod. With a bit of constructive vandalism at the rear end, I think Hercules could be persuaded to carry one (or even two), but dropping it with the needed accuracy might be an issue. Shackleton could probably be made to do the job, and I'm certain Lincoln would work (no surprise, given their bloodlines).
- splash
- Senior Service Rotorhead
- Posts: 13828
- Joined: May 1st, 2011, 11:02 am
- Location: Somerset England
Re: Rob's Tonka
How about a VC10, with its engins at the rear you would have space to recess the upkeep in the body.
My work bench is starting to look like Portsmouth Naval Dockyard.
Re: Rob's Tonka
Interesting ideas. The Cranberry and Buccaneer would of course manage the highball bouncers. But I'm stretching the topic here. Looking forward to the next upkeep update.
All the best.
Greg
All the best.
Greg
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe.
The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits.
Albert Einstein
The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits.
Albert Einstein
-
- NOT the sheep
- Posts: 26188
- Joined: November 26th, 2011, 6:11 pm
- Location: Pontefract West Yorkshire
Re: Rob's Tonka
Thinking about it, a Shackleton would make a great whiffer modified into Dambusters spec for anyone daring enough to give it a go. A new tool Airfix Shack mated to parts from a new tool Dambusters Lanc would look very smart if done right.
Doing - Tamiya 1/35th Universal Carrier.
Work is the curse of the modelling classes!
IPMS#12300
Work is the curse of the modelling classes!
IPMS#12300
-
- Modelling Gent and Scholar
- Posts: 3325
- Joined: November 4th, 2012, 11:28 am
- Location: The Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: Rob's Tonka
I think this might be problematic. You want all that extra weight roughly where he wings meet the body or a bit behind that (centre of lift), and the VC10 has the wing, and thus the main spar, right at the bottom of the body. There have been studies about converting airliner designs into bombers in the past, and all them ran afoul of having to cut the main spar to put the payload where it needs to go. That said, it sits rather high from the ground, so with some carefull puzzling it might be possible.splash wrote:How about a VC10, with its engins at the rear you would have space to recess the upkeep in the body.
Suggesting a low level bombrun with one of these might result in even more raised eyebrows than with the Lancs though..