Dazzled Stank ....Ready for Duty
- DavidWomby
- Modelling Gent and Scholar
- Posts: 11707
- Joined: May 1st, 2011, 8:09 pm
- Location: Florida, USA
Re: Dazzled Stank
Looking good. Still amazed by the concept of a turretless tank!
David
David
- Dazzled
- Modelling Gent and Scholar
- Posts: 9592
- Joined: October 1st, 2011, 11:08 pm
- Location: Mid Glamorgan, South Wales
- Contact:
Re: Dazzled Stank
dwomby wrote:Looking good. Still amazed by the concept of a turretless tank!
David
I think it's got more of a tank destroyer thing going on much like the German Stugs and Hetzer of WW2. It would certainly have difficulty firing on the move which would suggest it's more of a defensive weapon which fits in with Sweden's ongoing military policy.
It looks cool too
COLD WAR S.I.G. LEADER
Wherever there's danger, wherever there's trouble, wherever there's important work to be done....I'll be somewhere else building a model!
Wherever there's danger, wherever there's trouble, wherever there's important work to be done....I'll be somewhere else building a model!
- splash
- Senior Service Rotorhead
- Posts: 13828
- Joined: May 1st, 2011, 11:02 am
- Location: Somerset England
Re: Dazzled Stank
Excellent work it’s looking brilliant.
Have you seen this.
Have you seen this.
My work bench is starting to look like Portsmouth Naval Dockyard.
- Dazzled
- Modelling Gent and Scholar
- Posts: 9592
- Joined: October 1st, 2011, 11:08 pm
- Location: Mid Glamorgan, South Wales
- Contact:
Re: Dazzled Stank
Thanks for sharing that Alan. Really interesting stuff
COLD WAR S.I.G. LEADER
Wherever there's danger, wherever there's trouble, wherever there's important work to be done....I'll be somewhere else building a model!
Wherever there's danger, wherever there's trouble, wherever there's important work to be done....I'll be somewhere else building a model!
- DavidWomby
- Modelling Gent and Scholar
- Posts: 11707
- Joined: May 1st, 2011, 8:09 pm
- Location: Florida, USA
Re: Dazzled Stank
Thanks for the video, Splash. Some fascinating stuff in there - turbine engine, flotation ability, unable to fire while in motion (bad idea) but I think the two things that amused me most were the rear facing driving position and the pooping out the spent shell casings !!!!
David
David
- Dazzled
- Modelling Gent and Scholar
- Posts: 9592
- Joined: October 1st, 2011, 11:08 pm
- Location: Mid Glamorgan, South Wales
- Contact:
Re: Dazzled Stank
Recent progress has been stymied slightly by family commitments and my airbrush compressor breaking down. A little engineering intervention succeeded in getting it working again this morning and I was able to crack on and complete the S Tank. It already had the exterior stores fitted from a short session yesterday so all that was left o do was to add a coat of matt varnish; in this case Mig Ammo water based varnish which I'm using for the first time. It's not bad, if a little thin, and cleans up very easily.
Anyway, here's my completed S Tank.
So, what's the kit like?
Unfortunately, like most Trumpeter kits, it looks good in the box but gets let down by silly little things that are easily avoidable.
Good points include the level of detail and really nice surface detail. The sprues are well laid out and come individually bagged, which is always nice. The kit goes together well too with no filling required. Where they've been able to Trumpeter have moulded some parts so that the mould lines are at an edge and by doing so, either negating them altogether or at least making them easy to clean up. The decals, what few there are, are also pretty nice, going down easily with Microset/sol and having good colour definition and minimal carrier film. So the kit does have quite a bit going for it.
There are, however, a few areas where there is room for improvement. There was some flash on the parts and, where the parts weren't edged in the mould, some burring that was difficult to clean up. Despite a fairly reasonable effort to hide them there were still some ejector pin marks in some places that would have been visible on the finished model. The poly caps are not a tight fit in the wheels and this allows them to move around quite a bit. Also the tracks are pretty nasty. They don't have a lot of detail, are impervious to glue (so I couldn't get them to sag properly) and I'm pretty sure that they're a little too wide. If I'd known how bad they were before the GB started I'd have gone aftermarket for some replacements. Finally, and the worst aspect of this kit are the instructions. They're a bit odd to say the least. Colour callouts, as I previously pointed out, are best ignored and this is a typical Trumpeter trait. On top of the dodgy colours though are instructions that are vague and confusing. There doesn't seem to be any attempt to assemble anything in a logical sequence or illustrate correctly where quite a few of the parts go. For example, a picture could show the tank from the front quarter but parts from all over the vehicle are shown being fitted in that assembly stage. It makes for a chaotic build that needs constant vigilance to avoid missing parts. Also, some stages and sub-stages seem to have been put in as afterthoughts. There's definitely some remedial editing work that needs doing here as it's not really a complicated kit but the instructions do a very a very good job in making it seem like one.
Would I build another?
Yes, I probably would but with a few a/m improvements.
Anyway, here's my completed S Tank.
So, what's the kit like?
Unfortunately, like most Trumpeter kits, it looks good in the box but gets let down by silly little things that are easily avoidable.
Good points include the level of detail and really nice surface detail. The sprues are well laid out and come individually bagged, which is always nice. The kit goes together well too with no filling required. Where they've been able to Trumpeter have moulded some parts so that the mould lines are at an edge and by doing so, either negating them altogether or at least making them easy to clean up. The decals, what few there are, are also pretty nice, going down easily with Microset/sol and having good colour definition and minimal carrier film. So the kit does have quite a bit going for it.
There are, however, a few areas where there is room for improvement. There was some flash on the parts and, where the parts weren't edged in the mould, some burring that was difficult to clean up. Despite a fairly reasonable effort to hide them there were still some ejector pin marks in some places that would have been visible on the finished model. The poly caps are not a tight fit in the wheels and this allows them to move around quite a bit. Also the tracks are pretty nasty. They don't have a lot of detail, are impervious to glue (so I couldn't get them to sag properly) and I'm pretty sure that they're a little too wide. If I'd known how bad they were before the GB started I'd have gone aftermarket for some replacements. Finally, and the worst aspect of this kit are the instructions. They're a bit odd to say the least. Colour callouts, as I previously pointed out, are best ignored and this is a typical Trumpeter trait. On top of the dodgy colours though are instructions that are vague and confusing. There doesn't seem to be any attempt to assemble anything in a logical sequence or illustrate correctly where quite a few of the parts go. For example, a picture could show the tank from the front quarter but parts from all over the vehicle are shown being fitted in that assembly stage. It makes for a chaotic build that needs constant vigilance to avoid missing parts. Also, some stages and sub-stages seem to have been put in as afterthoughts. There's definitely some remedial editing work that needs doing here as it's not really a complicated kit but the instructions do a very a very good job in making it seem like one.
Would I build another?
Yes, I probably would but with a few a/m improvements.
COLD WAR S.I.G. LEADER
Wherever there's danger, wherever there's trouble, wherever there's important work to be done....I'll be somewhere else building a model!
Wherever there's danger, wherever there's trouble, wherever there's important work to be done....I'll be somewhere else building a model!
- Spaceowl
- Modelling Gent and Scholar
- Posts: 1081
- Joined: July 1st, 2011, 8:41 am
- Location: Middlesbrough, Peoples' Republic of Teesside
Re: Dazzled Stank
Well, that looks pretty good to me, and what problems there are with it seem to be the fault of kit, not builder. A nice first AFV for the group build, in fact.
Overhead a rainbow appears...in black and white.
Current Projects:
Aircraft of VMA-542, USMC
Peru-Ecuador War 1995
THK 1939-2023
Polish Air Force 1939
Current Projects:
Aircraft of VMA-542, USMC
Peru-Ecuador War 1995
THK 1939-2023
Polish Air Force 1939
- Kitaholic
- Modelling Gent and Scholar
- Posts: 3765
- Joined: November 10th, 2014, 7:53 pm
- Location: 5 mins from SMW
Re: Dazzled Stank
That's a beauty mate, look forward to seeing it on the table
Regards
Gord
Desperately trying to find his MOJO, don't know where I left it
Gord
Desperately trying to find his MOJO, don't know where I left it
-
- Modelling Gent and Scholar
- Posts: 1086
- Joined: November 15th, 2014, 12:43 am
Re: Dazzled Stank
that looks wonderful Dazzled you have built a fine example of a Stank and i think the weathering is outstanding ,its been a pleasure watching your build of this tank and has made me want to build some Scandinavian armor now, btw the matt varnish is it the lucky varnish ,i take it you didn't thin it and what PSI did you spray it at
cheers craig
cheers craig
- Dazzled
- Modelling Gent and Scholar
- Posts: 9592
- Joined: October 1st, 2011, 11:08 pm
- Location: Mid Glamorgan, South Wales
- Contact:
Re: Dazzled Stank
Thanks everybody
Craig: The varnish is indeed the Lucky Varnish that I bought at Telford.
It comes in a 60ml bottle and cost £4.50 so it's pretty good value when compared to say Tamiya's XF-86 which costs around £1.70 for 10ml. The bottle has instructions for correct use on the side, which is better than most manufacturers manage, and advises that the varnish does not need thinning and ideally should be sprayed at 17psi in light coats. I followed this, using a 0.4mm nozzle, and had no problems at all.
It does have one of those awkward Vallejo style nozzles...
But it's easy to remove so it is possible to get in there and mix it, although I did give it an initial mix before decanting it and giving it the full treatment with the trusty electric paint stirrer.
And finally, being water based, it's a lot safer than other varnishes and it's a doddle to clean the airbrush afterwards.
One of my better Telford acquisitions
Craig: The varnish is indeed the Lucky Varnish that I bought at Telford.
It comes in a 60ml bottle and cost £4.50 so it's pretty good value when compared to say Tamiya's XF-86 which costs around £1.70 for 10ml. The bottle has instructions for correct use on the side, which is better than most manufacturers manage, and advises that the varnish does not need thinning and ideally should be sprayed at 17psi in light coats. I followed this, using a 0.4mm nozzle, and had no problems at all.
It does have one of those awkward Vallejo style nozzles...
But it's easy to remove so it is possible to get in there and mix it, although I did give it an initial mix before decanting it and giving it the full treatment with the trusty electric paint stirrer.
And finally, being water based, it's a lot safer than other varnishes and it's a doddle to clean the airbrush afterwards.
One of my better Telford acquisitions
COLD WAR S.I.G. LEADER
Wherever there's danger, wherever there's trouble, wherever there's important work to be done....I'll be somewhere else building a model!
Wherever there's danger, wherever there's trouble, wherever there's important work to be done....I'll be somewhere else building a model!
-
- NOT the sheep
- Posts: 26118
- Joined: November 26th, 2011, 6:11 pm
- Location: Pontefract West Yorkshire
Re: Dazzled Stank
That is a great piece of armour modelling, Daz, very well done with it. Did you get your compressor fixed? Mine gave trouble a few years ago and I was lost without it - I even had to finish a model using paint brushes, aaaaaagh, the horror of that still gives me the chills
Doing - Tamiya 1/35th Universal Carrier.
Work is the curse of the modelling classes!
IPMS#12300
Work is the curse of the modelling classes!
IPMS#12300
-
- Modelling Gent and Scholar
- Posts: 3317
- Joined: November 4th, 2012, 11:28 am
- Location: The Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: Dazzled Stank
I'm no armour guy, but it certainly looks the part to me. Nice work.Dazzled wrote:Anyway, here's my completed S Tank
If the wikipedia page is to be believed, the lack of a turret was no particular disadvantage in actual use, in fact, with the hatches closed, it acquired targets and fired faster than a Leopard I. Unconventional design, yes, but properly designed for it's unconventional nature.
- Dazzled
- Modelling Gent and Scholar
- Posts: 9592
- Joined: October 1st, 2011, 11:08 pm
- Location: Mid Glamorgan, South Wales
- Contact:
Re: Dazzled Stank
I got it going but it's packed up again. The same mechanical drive fault I'm afraid. I have a more extreme intervention in mind this time. Watch this spaceShaunW wrote:That is a great piece of armour modelling, Daz, very well done with it. Did you get your compressor fixed? Mine gave trouble a few years ago and I was lost without it - I even had to finish a model using paint brushes, aaaaaagh, the horror of that still gives me the chills
COLD WAR S.I.G. LEADER
Wherever there's danger, wherever there's trouble, wherever there's important work to be done....I'll be somewhere else building a model!
Wherever there's danger, wherever there's trouble, wherever there's important work to be done....I'll be somewhere else building a model!
- Old_Tonto
- Modelling Gent and Scholar
- Posts: 8049
- Joined: May 1st, 2011, 7:41 pm
- Location: Middlesbrough, Peoples Republic of Teesside.
Re: Dazzled Stank
That's a cracking build Dazzled, really lovely work and fun to watch.
I agree entirely with you regarding the instructions, I've pretty much abandoned following mine.
I agree entirely with you regarding the instructions, I've pretty much abandoned following mine.
2023 - A:0 B:0 C:0
Current Projects:
East German Air Force (1956-90)
South African Air Force (1958-93)
Current Projects:
East German Air Force (1956-90)
South African Air Force (1958-93)
- The Great Auk
- Modelling Gent and Scholar
- Posts: 2041
- Joined: August 16th, 2014, 12:35 pm
- Location: Extinction Isle
Re: Dazzled Stank
Simply outstanding in every way!
You could pose this in front of a color photo of a field or such and no one would be any the wiser it wasn't the real deal.
Dazzled you have some off-the-charts skill!
The Great Auk
You could pose this in front of a color photo of a field or such and no one would be any the wiser it wasn't the real deal.
Dazzled you have some off-the-charts skill!
The Great Auk