Page 4 of 5

Re: VTOL Group Build?

Posted: December 2nd, 2017, 2:56 am
by DavidWomby
Should be good. I think the Italeri kit is the old Esci mould. Reckoned to be excellent.

David

Re: VTOL Group Build?

Posted: December 2nd, 2017, 3:04 pm
by MarkyM607
59North wrote:I have never built a Harrier.
Then I saw an Arctic scheme on here, and went fishing for a kit. I blame you all.

I've placed 3 pumpkin seeds in an old film container, and shaken it at the moon. I wonder if I should have chalked a circle on the ground and done an ape dance for insurance.

I bought an Italeri GR3, 1:72nd with all the AM fixings.
1.Shame on you!! :lol:
2.Our pleasure :twisted:
2.Very good/probably :-D :grin:
3.Excellent! :grin:

Re: VTOL Group Build?

Posted: December 2nd, 2017, 5:57 pm
by DavidWomby
So are we starting soon?

I have been assuming we are restricting scope to things that actually flew - ie. no sci-fi, designs that didn't get built, whatifs, etc. but don't object personally if the group want those in.

David

Re: VTOL Group Build?

Posted: December 2nd, 2017, 6:20 pm
by IronMan129
I'm ready to put this into the shared build section for a year.

As its a shared build which is a little less strict on rules whats everyone's thoughts on kits starting condition?

Re: VTOL Group Build?

Posted: December 2nd, 2017, 6:49 pm
by MarkyM607
Maverick231 wrote:I'm ready to put this into the shared build section for a year.

As its a shared build which is a little less strict on rules whats everyone's thoughts on kits starting condition?
If it's a shared build perhaps started condition wouldn't be too much of a problem. I might build another Harrier, unless Mav has had all the bits :ha: :ha: :ha: :ha:
On the other hand I have some helicopters... is the Britten-Norman Islander a STOL aircraft??.

Re: VTOL Group Build?

Posted: December 2nd, 2017, 6:56 pm
by fredk
Part started; its either 0 or anything; setting any % it will be hard to say 'that is 25% completed, that one is more'
What is '25% built' ?
No matter what % it will be too low for someone

Re: VTOL Group Build?

Posted: December 2nd, 2017, 8:26 pm
by IronMan129
Ok stuff it lets go with any condition, Haha yeah I've had a bit off you haven't I :D.
You may as well send me that spares box dedicated to Harriers haha!

On a serious note though Im not sure STOL fits into it mate.
Its aimed at things that basically go up and down haha!(pardon the pun)

Re: VTOL Group Build?

Posted: December 3rd, 2017, 1:23 am
by JohnRatzenberger
As a reminder:
-- SB are limited to fewer than 6 players.
-- Since SB are not GB, the 36-month between does not apply and it could be a Harrier SB.

Re: VTOL Group Build?

Posted: December 3rd, 2017, 8:13 am
by Kitaholic
What happens if you start off with fewer than 6 but people want to join after it starts?Does it then become a GB?
If we make it a Harrier SB then it becomes a Harrier GB doesn't it then break the 36 month rule?
Also if we allow part started kits in the SB that becomes a GB, that's another rule broken.
Bit of a grey area

Re: VTOL Shared Build

Posted: December 4th, 2017, 10:10 pm
by IronMan129
Shall we put it as a VTOL SB for a year and just go from there?

Re: VTOL Shared Build

Posted: December 5th, 2017, 5:12 am
by Kitaholic
ok with me

Re: VTOL Shared Build

Posted: December 5th, 2017, 5:54 pm
by Old_Tonto
So what has been decided? Can someone recap please.

Re: VTOL Shared Build

Posted: December 5th, 2017, 10:52 pm
by IronMan129
From what I have read people are open to anything so I think the best course of action would be a year long shared build.

Re: VTOL Shared Build

Posted: December 5th, 2017, 11:52 pm
by DavidWomby
I think we are at this point.

It's a shared build starting now for a year. Subject is any VTOL vehicle including Harriers but probably not sci fi or whatifs ( not 100% sure about that constraint being agreed ). Started models allowed at Mav's discretion on case by case basis.

David (mulling choice of kit to build)

Re: VTOL Shared Build

Posted: December 6th, 2017, 7:07 am
by Kitaholic
Mulling choice of kit to build is definitely the hard part