Fujimi 1/72 F-4K # Finished

Military or civil, triplanes, biplanes or monoplanes, props, jets or helicopters...models in here.
User avatar
novokits
Active Participant
Posts: 924
Joined: May 1st, 2011, 9:58 am
Location: Moscow
Contact:

Fujimi 1/72 F-4K # Finished

Post by novokits »

I'll return to SHAR after this build. So, first - cockpit install in fuselage halve with some problem, two - this kit better than US Phantom's from Fujimi :grin:

Image

Image

Image

Matchbox pilot figures (with some fitness procedure)

Image

Image
Saxon
Modelling Gent and Scholar
Posts: 1407
Joined: May 1st, 2011, 4:05 am
Location: Behind You

Re: Fujimi 1/72 F-4K

Post by Saxon »

I like the Fujimi Phantoms, should look good when done
peebeep

Re: Fujimi 1/72 F-4K

Post by peebeep »

novokits wrote:this kit better than US Phantom's from Fujimi :grin:
Apart from the F-4J(UK), the 'British' Phantoms were completely new tool kits.

peebeep
User avatar
Dirkpitt289
NUMA's Auto Mechanic
Posts: 8724
Joined: May 2nd, 2011, 1:55 am
Location: New jersey USA
Contact:

Re: Fujimi 1/72 F-4K

Post by Dirkpitt289 »

Nice work so far. I have several Fujimi Phantoms in my stash and I'm waiting for the right time to build them. This build is going to make it difficult for me to resist starting one before I'm ready.
.... Dirk

Beware of the DOG's of WAR

My Youtube Channel
https://www.youtube.com/user/ModelingGu ... rid&view=0
User avatar
novokits
Active Participant
Posts: 924
Joined: May 1st, 2011, 9:58 am
Location: Moscow
Contact:

Re: Fujimi 1/72 F-4K

Post by novokits »

this strange, Fujimi and Hasegawa has make out pylon together with fuel tank. Separate only centreline and inner pylons Image
User avatar
splash
Senior Service Rotorhead
Posts: 13828
Joined: May 1st, 2011, 11:02 am
Location: Somerset England

Re: Fujimi 1/72 F-4K

Post by splash »

It’s great to see a Royal Navy F4K of 767 squadron being built, I worked on that actual a/c back in the early 70’s as a Naval Aircraft Mechanic, just before I changed branches to become a Naval Aircrewman.

The Fujimi box art was spot on.

Regards
Splash
My work bench is starting to look like Portsmouth Naval Dockyard.
User avatar
novokits
Active Participant
Posts: 924
Joined: May 1st, 2011, 9:58 am
Location: Moscow
Contact:

Re: Fujimi 1/72 F-4K

Post by novokits »

which squadron operated from Ark Royal except 892?
User avatar
splash
Senior Service Rotorhead
Posts: 13828
Joined: May 1st, 2011, 11:02 am
Location: Somerset England

Re: Fujimi 1/72 F-4K

Post by splash »

The RN only had two F4K squadrons 767 training squadron at Yeovilton and 892 on the Ark Royal, they also had 700P initially as the trials squadron but that became 892.

The Ark would have had Buccaneers from 809, Gannets from 849, Seakings from I think 824 and a dedicated Wessex for SAR and plane guard.

Regards
Splash
My work bench is starting to look like Portsmouth Naval Dockyard.
User avatar
novokits
Active Participant
Posts: 924
Joined: May 1st, 2011, 9:58 am
Location: Moscow
Contact:

Re: Fujimi 1/72 F-4K

Post by novokits »

splash, FAA Phantoms has flew with the SUU-23 gun pod? or this gun pod was used only RAF machines?
User avatar
splash
Senior Service Rotorhead
Posts: 13828
Joined: May 1st, 2011, 11:02 am
Location: Somerset England

Re: Fujimi 1/72 F-4K

Post by splash »

novokits wrote:splash, FAA Phantoms has flew with the SUU-23 gun pod? or this gun pod was used only RAF machines?
Last weekend I spoke to an armorer who served on 767 squadron and he said he never saw the gun fitted to the Phantom the normal fit was sparrow, sidewinders, dropped tanks and bombs.

I also spoke to an other armorer from 892 squadron who thought they did fit the gun.

I'm sorry if that just confuses the matter.

Regards
Splash
My work bench is starting to look like Portsmouth Naval Dockyard.
User avatar
novokits
Active Participant
Posts: 924
Joined: May 1st, 2011, 9:58 am
Location: Moscow
Contact:

Re: Fujimi 1/72 F-4K

Post by novokits »

Thank you, Splash!
probably I'll make bombs on outer pylons...
Miggers
The Bug Has Well And Truly Bitten
Posts: 205
Joined: May 1st, 2011, 12:32 am

Re: Fujimi 1/72 F-4K

Post by Miggers »

splash wrote:
novokits wrote:splash, FAA Phantoms has flew with the SUU-23 gun pod? or this gun pod was used only RAF machines?
Last weekend I spoke to an armorer who served on 767 squadron and he said he never saw the gun fitted to the Phantom the normal fit was sparrow, sidewinders, dropped tanks and bombs.

I also spoke to an other armorer from 892 squadron who thought they did fit the gun.

I'm sorry if that just confuses the matter.

Regards
Splash
Splash is pretty spot on,I've never seen a photo of an 892 or 767 kite with the gun pod
fitted.

You can't beat a Fujimi FAA FG-1,they make a superb rendition of the beast.
Mine is an 892 kite with just a drill Sidewinder on the starb'd pylon.

Incidentally,a full re-heat launch burnt enough fuel to keep a Seaking aloft
for two hours,and you though helos were thirsty things :shock: !!!

Mark
You could see him thinking "Bleedin'pilots,don't know nuffin.All glammer" He's probably right.

A/C.2 Webber,Manston,1941,First Light by Geoff Wellum.
MerlinJones

Re: Fujimi 1/72 F-4K

Post by MerlinJones »

The gun was/is a ground attack tool and was favoured by the RAF for that role, when they acquired Navy Phantoms.
Often, with lots of rocket pods.
Whilst the Navy aircraft did have a ground attack capability, their main role was intended to be fleet defence, with some recce thrown in.

Regards,
Bruce
User avatar
JamesPerrin
Looks like his avatar
Posts: 13695
Joined: April 5th, 2011, 8:09 pm
Location: W. Yorkshire
Contact:

Re: Fujimi 1/72 F-4K

Post by JamesPerrin »

Ooh goodie, how did I miss you starting this beauty NovoKits. I've yet to build mine but I get the distinct impression this is one of 'those' kits everyone should build once.
Classic British Kits SIG Leader Better to fettle than to fill
(2024 A:B 5:2) (2023 13:8:7) (2022 21:11) (2021 15:8) (2020 8:4:4)
User avatar
novokits
Active Participant
Posts: 924
Joined: May 1st, 2011, 9:58 am
Location: Moscow
Contact:

Re: Fujimi 1/72 F-4K

Post by novokits »

In the meantime, I continue...
Unfortunately without a putty it is building has not managed, as well as without rescriber lost panel lines

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

and weapons: on this photo I see Sidewinder x2 and Matra 68mm container x2 on inner pylon, Matra install on TER BRU-42/A (ITER) or some other device?? I can use this ejector rack from Hasegawa weapon set and in Matchbox kit use this TER too?

Image
Post Reply

Return to “Aviation Modelling”