Softscience Labs 2.5

[Lone Modeller]

I really do like you weathered and battered aircraft. They look worn but not so much that they look as though they are headed for the scrapyard!

[PaulBradley]

If anyone asks, I'll claim Bougainville

LOL!

And the onus is on skeptics to prove you wrong.

[JohnRatzenberger]

"I like how it looks" trumps "I was told..."

[Softscience]

I really do like you weathered and battered aircraft. They look worn but not so much that they look as though they are headed for the scrapyard!

Thanks.

I've seen a few pictures of aircraft where they are awfully filthy, and evidently still in service (though I wonder how common that was/is). Like you though, I prefer the used but not battered aesthetic on airplanes. I think even my tanks are modestly weathered, in comparison to what many modelers are doing.

Like with all things in this hobby, it should all come down to personal choice.

[Stuart]

I agree with LM, nicely weathered but not overly so - it looks great Ralph. Personally I'd leave the bomb on too.

Is it the Eduard kit?

[jssel]

Very nice Ralph. IMHO the weathering is just right. Reflects operational use without distracting the lines of the aircraft.

[Softscience]

I agree with LM, nicely weathered but not overly so - it looks great Ralph. Personally I'd leave the bomb on too.

Is it the Eduard kit?

Hasegawa.

And thanks