AirModel 1/72: Martin P6M-2 SeaMaster **FINISHED**

Military or civil, triplanes, biplanes or monoplanes, props, jets or helicopters...models in here.
Post Reply
User avatar
PropWash
Active Participant
Posts: 562
Joined: October 14th, 2017, 5:39 am
Location: Tennessee, USA

AirModel 1/72: Martin P6M-2 SeaMaster **FINISHED**

Post by PropWash »

Recently, I tried to build a model of the HMS Dreadnought in 1/700 scale. It was a wonderful kit by Trumpeter and was full of PE parts to add detail. So why no build thread? Because I made such a mess of the PE parts and became so frustrated that I wadded it up, threw it back in its box, and then consigned it to the inky depths of the back of my closet. :evil: I can say the kit wasn't to blame (well partially, as some parts really did not need to be PE and only increased the difficulty unnecessarily) as it was mostly my fumbling fingers that mucked it up.

I only tell you the to let you know where I am with this project. You would think I would build something easier (a nice jet, for example). But no, I am jumping from one building disaster to another (potential) disaster. Remember that Lysander conversion I did a while back ( http://uamf.org.uk/viewtopic.php?f=19&t ... =seamaster )? That was really done for me to get a taste of building with vacuformed (VF) parts in preparation to build this SeaMaster kit. I had been putting it off as I learned I didn't really care for VF modeling. But when I sent an email to the friend who sent me this kit, in which I complained / whined about the Dreadnought model, he jokingly asked how my progress was with the SeaMaster. I felt a little guilty, as he is also sick now, so I thought I best get cracking at it.

So, I've begun this "little" project and anticipate it will be ongoing for a while as it will require a lot of scratch building and working with VF parts. Both skills I lack.

Maybe I should go back to the Dreadnought? ;-)

The Martin P6M SeaMaster

In 1949, the US Navy planned to create a Seaplane Strike Force (SSF) which would consist of jet-powered seaplanes that were capable of carrying-out nuclear strikes (in addition to conventional bomb loads / mines). In 1951, the Navy began accepting proposals from various aircraft manufacturers. By late 1952, the Martin Aircraft Co., was awarded a contract to build six evaluation aircraft (designated XP6M-1) and twenty-four production aircraft (designated P6M-2).

The construction of the first P6M-1 was completed in Dec., 1954. Flight tests began in July, 1955. Initial testing revealed that the engines had a tendency to burn the rear of the fuselage (limiting the use of the afterburners). In Dec., 1955, the first prototype experienced control problems and broke-up in flight - killing its crew of four. Flight tests resumed in May, 1956. The second prototype, now fitted with ejection seats, went out of control during flight tests in Nov, 1956, and crashed. The crew was able to eject safely. Apparently there were miscalculations regarding the tail assembly which was the cause of these accidents.

Changes were now made to the design of the aircraft. The problems with the tail were corrected and the engines were moved back from the wing's leading edge (to reduce seawater ingestion) and splayed-out from the sides (no more burnt fuselage!). Flight tests resumed in Jan., 1958. The aircraft, which carried its munition inside a rotating, water-proof, bomb-bay (think F-102 / 106 aircraft), also began doing practice bomb runs. Testing began to show the aircraft had real promise with the new design changes. The first production aircraft, the P6M-2, was delivered in early 1959.

The P6M-2 was also equipped with new and more power engines. The SeaMaster could fly "on the deck" at Mach .09 (the B-52 could only do .55). Unfortunately, just as things were getting started, the Navy began to see the future was not with large subsonic seaplane bombers. Instead the future was with submarine launched nuclear missiles - the Polaris. With three completed P6M-2 Seaplanes, and five in production, the US Navy cancelled the program in August, 1959. The existing aircraft were to sit unused for years before being broken-up for scrap.

Specifications (from Wikipedia)

Crew: 4
Length: 134 ft 4 in (40.94 m)
Wingspan: 102 ft 7 in (31.26 m)
Height: 33 ft 10 in (10.31 m)
Wing area: 1,900 sq ft (176.52 m²)
Empty weight: 97,439 lb (44,198 kg)
Useful load: 86,841 lb (39,390 kg)
Loaded weight: 162,932 lb Combat / 184,280 lb T.O. (73,905 kg Combat / 83,588 kg T.O.)
Max. takeoff weight: 190,000 lb Calm water / 160,000 lb Rough water (86,183 kg Calm water / 72,575 kg Rough water) **Allowable 6 to 9 ft (1.8 to 2.7 m) swells**
Powerplant: 4 × Pratt & Whitney J75-P-2 turbojets, 17,500 lbf (77.8 kN) each

Performance

Maximum speed: (Sea Level) 596 kn (686 mph (1,104 km/h)) - (20,000 ft) 564 kn, (35,000 ft) 520 kn
Cruise speed: 465 kn (535 mph (861 km/h))
Stall speed: 132.2 kn (Power off, flaps down, T.O. wt) (152 mph (245 km/h))
Range: 1,810 nmi (Combat) (2,083 mi (3,352 km))
Combat radius: 750 nm (863 mi (1,389 km)) (Carrying 30,000 lb (14,000 kg) payload)
Service ceiling: 50,000 ft (15,240 m)
Rate of climb: 7,380 ft/min (37.5 m/s) - Sea Level, T.O. wt, Military Power
Wing loading: 100 lb/(sq ft) (310 kg/m²)
Thrust/weight: 0.368

Armament

Guns: 2 × 20 mm cannon in rear remote operated turret (1,000 RDS/20mm)
Mines: 28 x MK36 Mod 1 (1,001 lb/ea, 454 kg/ea) - 28,028 lb/Tot (12,713 kg)
Mines: 15 x MK25 Mod 2 (2,030 lb/ea, 921 kg/ea) - 30,450 lb/Tot (13,812 kg)
Mines: 36 x MK50 Mod 0 (504 lb/ea, 228 kg/ea) - 18,144 lb/Tot (8,230 kg)
Mines: 15 x MK52 Mod 0,1,2,3,4,5,6 (1,348 lb/ea, 611 kg/ea) - 20,220 lb/Tot (9,172 kg)
Mines: 8 x MK39 Mod 0 (2,025 lb/ea, 919 kg/ea) - 16,200 lb/Tot (7,348 kg)
Mines: 15 x MK19 Mod 2 (540 lb/ea, 245 kg/ea) - 8,100 lb/Tot (3,674 kg)
Mines: 5 x MK10 Mod 9 (1,960 lb/ea, 889 kg/ea) - 9,800 lb/Tot (4,445 kg)
Reconnaissance: High Altitude Reconnaissance Camera 4,050 lb/Tot (1,837 kg)
Reconnaissance: 27 x M120(T9E8) Photoflash (154 lb/ea, 70 kg/ea) 4,158 pounds (1,886 kg)
Bomb: 2 x MK91 (3,500 lb/ea, 1,588 kg/ea) - 7,000 lb/Tot (3,175 kg)
Bomb: 1 x MK28 (1,800 lb/ea, 817 kg/ea) - 1,800 lb/Tot (817 kg)
Fire-Control System: Aero X-23B AGL Tail Turret, ASQ-29 Automatic Navigation & Minelaying System

Image
Photo is public domain

AirModel SeaMaster Kit

Here's are photos of what I have to work with:

Image

Two sheets of good-quality VF plastic. Moldings aren't the crispest, put are not unexpected for the age of this short-run kit (I believe it is from the late 1980s).

Image

The instructions, I will say, are not the best in the world. The VF canopy is at the bottom.

Image

One sheet is now (roughly) cut-out. This took about 15-20 minutes.

You can see I have my work cut-out for me. I'll keep you posted as the build progresses. But don't be surprised if I need to stop and regroup now and then. :roll: ;-)
User avatar
gnomemeansgnome
Modelling Gent and Scholar
Posts: 5269
Joined: July 16th, 2013, 4:03 pm
Location: No Fun City

Re: AirModel 1/72: Martin P6M-2 SeaMaster - What am I doing!

Post by gnomemeansgnome »

This will make a very compelling build. Good luck! I have a small clutch of vacuforms moldering away in storage and none of them are as ambitious as this.
Ego no habeo consilium.

ICBM = Insatiable Collector and Builder of Models
User avatar
iggie
Modelling Gent and Scholar
Posts: 23438
Joined: July 31st, 2013, 11:04 am
Location: North Somercotes, Lincolnshire
Contact:

Re: AirModel 1/72: Martin P6M-2 SeaMaster - What am I doing!

Post by iggie »

Blimey! This is going to be fun to watch :-D

Image
Best wishes

Jim
If you can walk away from a landing, it's a good landing. If you use the airplane the next day, it's an outstanding landing
"Never put off till tomorrow, what you can do the day after tomorrow"
User avatar
pmmaker
Active Participant
Posts: 788
Joined: October 11th, 2017, 11:14 pm
Location: Somers, Connecticut, USA

Re: AirModel 1/72: Martin P6M-2 SeaMaster - What am I doing!

Post by pmmaker »

Here we go again! Propwash's almost legendary gift for finding rare, obscure, and difficult to build kits strikes again! ;-)

Looks like you found another challenge build Brett. Based on your previous builds, I predict a favorable outcome with a striking model of a plane that very few will ever have or build. I too will await the completed build. I'm sure the finished model will be worth the wait. :mrgreen:

pmmaker
(Allan)
The Mad Hatter: "Have I gone mad"
Alice: “I’m afraid so. . . you’re entirely bonkers. But I’ll tell you a secret. . . All the BEST people are.”
User avatar
Stamford
Modelling Gent and Scholar
Posts: 2240
Joined: May 1st, 2011, 7:42 am
Location: Klågerup Sweden

Re: AirModel 1/72: Martin P6M-2 SeaMaster - What am I doing!

Post by Stamford »

It´s a really cool subject!
running at the edge of their world
shangos70
Modelling Gent and Scholar
Posts: 4422
Joined: May 1st, 2011, 11:14 am
Location: Doncaster, Socialist Republic of South Yorkshire.

Re: AirModel 1/72: Martin P6M-2 SeaMaster - What am I doing!

Post by shangos70 »

When I was a young lad a had a book with an article on this aircraft, I thought it was the most gorgeous looking thing at the time. looking forward to seeing this build come to fruition.
ShaunW
NOT the sheep
Posts: 26188
Joined: November 26th, 2011, 6:11 pm
Location: Pontefract West Yorkshire

Re: AirModel 1/72: Martin P6M-2 SeaMaster - What am I doing!

Post by ShaunW »

Great subject choice, PW. I've never built a vac form kit and so will be watching your efforts here with interest and I hope your friend's health is improving.
Doing - Tamiya 1/35th Universal Carrier.

Work is the curse of the modelling classes!
IPMS#12300
User avatar
The Great Auk
Modelling Gent and Scholar
Posts: 2041
Joined: August 16th, 2014, 12:35 pm
Location: Extinction Isle

Re: AirModel 1/72: Martin P6M-2 SeaMaster - What am I doing!

Post by The Great Auk »

iggie wrote:Blimey! This is going to be fun to watch :-D

Image
Wot 'e said!

The Great Auk
celt
Modelling Gent and Scholar
Posts: 3271
Joined: July 6th, 2014, 3:19 pm

Re: AirModel 1/72: Martin P6M-2 SeaMaster - What am I doing!

Post by celt »

The Great Auk wrote:
iggie wrote:Blimey! This is going to be fun to watch :-D

Image
Wot 'e said!

The Great Auk
Ditto.
Regards
celt
Lone Modeller
Modelling Gent and Scholar
Posts: 5345
Joined: April 1st, 2013, 6:45 pm

Re: AirModel 1/72: Martin P6M-2 SeaMaster - What am I doing!

Post by Lone Modeller »

I admire anyone who tackles a vacuform, although I regularly mould my own parts! Keep at it is my advice - your Lysander was a real success and I am completely certain that this one will be too.

In my experience the problems we imagine that we will encounter are rarely as great as the ones we actually have to overcome.
User avatar
FAAMAN
The Bug Has Well And Truly Bitten
Posts: 404
Joined: October 14th, 2014, 3:49 am
Location: Sydney Australia

Re: AirModel 1/72: Martin P6M-2 SeaMaster - What am I doing!

Post by FAAMAN »

Maybe you should talk to a VacForm master like Vacant for some pointers on this.
It'll be definitely different when finished, will watch this with interest ;-) ;-)
Been modelling for years, still learning . . . .
Model kits are meant to be assembled . . . . . . . . . . eventually.
vacant
Modelling Gent and Scholar
Posts: 3847
Joined: August 5th, 2012, 9:58 pm

Re: AirModel 1/72: Martin P6M-2 SeaMaster - What am I doing!

Post by vacant »

I have every confidence that Propwash will find his own salvation during the build. I seldom take my own advice on anything so giving any would be an unnecessary distraction.
User avatar
PropWash
Active Participant
Posts: 562
Joined: October 14th, 2017, 5:39 am
Location: Tennessee, USA

Re: AirModel 1/72: Martin P6M-2 SeaMaster - What am I doing!

Post by PropWash »

My sincere thanks to you all for your kind comments, encouragement, and well-wishes for my friend. All are greatly appreciated.

Not a lot of progress this week as I came down with some awful pre-flu season malady. I was home for much of last week and didn't have it in me to stand in a hot garage to trim and sand parts. That said, before sickness struck I sanded a few of the smaller parts to see how they would go. Yes, just as terrible as I remembered from the Lysander project. It took forever (ok, somewhat dramatic, but it FELT like it took forever) to do the small parts and I tried to find a faster and easier way online. The method I chose was to use my rotary tool to trim as close to the lines I had drawn on the parts, then manually sand down to the lines. It was tricky work, fraught with peril, but it did work and sped things up quite a bit. So here's a pic of what I did last night. One sheet of styrene down, one to go!


Image
ShaunW
NOT the sheep
Posts: 26188
Joined: November 26th, 2011, 6:11 pm
Location: Pontefract West Yorkshire

Re: AirModel 1/72: Martin P6M-2 SeaMaster - What am I doing!

Post by ShaunW »

Hopefully you're fully recovered now, PW. Those parts look neat and tidy to me!
Doing - Tamiya 1/35th Universal Carrier.

Work is the curse of the modelling classes!
IPMS#12300
celt
Modelling Gent and Scholar
Posts: 3271
Joined: July 6th, 2014, 3:19 pm

Re: AirModel 1/72: Martin P6M-2 SeaMaster - What am I doing!

Post by celt »

Well tidy progress.
Regards
celt
Post Reply

Return to “Aviation Modelling”